Archive for June, 2015
One Simple Act Cast Sheet explains what is and what isn’t acceptable.
Reading the cover page tells you no need to bag your recyclables, just use the blue container.
Click on How to recycle correctly and there are the do’s and don’ts.
A few months ago we were told “no plastic bags” and many neighbors including my husband thought that meant not to “bag” the recyclables in plastic. I told them “no” plastic bags are not acceptable. We still need to take them to the grocery store. Now many grocery stores will not accept them. We are trying to shift our thinking to toting organic and reusable bags back and forth to the market. When we shop a the West Side Market, this is not a problem since we having bringing our own bags for 30+ years.
For some reason, we constantly walk out without them when going to Heinen’s. Now, we are being overrun by the many options of “what to buy” when we forget. I am hoping that soon, very soon we can remember them. The other option is to keep them in the car, but then the car will be overrun with “totes.
Again, here it is in black and white. Plastic bags & wrap, plastic toys outdoor furniture and PVC piping a re on the “don’t list.
Channel 19 shared Stephen Ohlemacher’s Associated Press article Report: SOcial Security overpaid nearly half on disability. citing a government study which says Social Security overpaid nearly half of those on disability.
The copyright says : Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Therefore, I am not sharing, but you can find it most anywhere-ABC NEWS, CNN, AOL just Google Stephen Ohlemeyer social security.
Here are my questions: Who was overpaid, why were they overpaid and how has this been corrected? From personal experience I am flummoxed to see that these overpayments seem to be made year after year. In my opinion, this kind of reporting does little else expect put fuel on the fire of “class divide” between those who fund and those who receive. Where is the outrage for those charged with administering these funds? Why are corrections not placed into the programming to “catch” these mistakes?
In my mind, this type of article does more to promote a "class divide" instead of shedding light on how a government agency with so much technology at its beck and call cannot figure out the "right" benefit to give. Making it so funders and recipients alike are left with inadequate data.
For a short time in 2009, I received disability payments. It took just 6 months to get approval on what I would receive, when I would receive it and how long I would receive it. The government wanted to divide it into 3 payments. I asked to have it in two since I had already waited six months. After submitting expenses for those six months, I received the first of two payments. It was cut and dried. I have a friend who receives payments as well. Each year adjustments are made- the first in January when her check is increased- this year it was $10. In July, her rent is recalculated-it will go up $2; therefore, she will be able to use the $8 to pay the increase in her phone bill because she is still forced to keep a land line for life line (the discount has expired because supposedly soon she will be able to have a cell phone instead). With this kind of micromanaging which is neither here nor there, I just want to know HOW the government has overpaid these people for supposedly years.
A study is cited but I have been unable to find a link to that specifically. The article says ”according to a government watchdog”. The next sentence says “in all, Social Security overpaid beneficiaries by nearly $17 billion, according to a 10-year study be the agency’s inspector general. Who is the government agency and who is the inspector general? Lots of questions, few answers.
This link is provided: http://www.ssa.gov/disability/